Measure
Obtain the required site or feeder load value from the approved metering and communication arrangement.

• Keeps charging load within a defined site limit • Redistributes power as vehicle demand changes • Coordinates chargers with other facility loads • Supports multi-bay commercial charging projects • 40–240kW charger configurations available • DC200–1000V supports varied EV platforms • Optional OCPP enables managed operation
A Dynamic Load Balancing DC Charger adjusts charging output according to an enforceable site limit, active vehicle demand and configured allocation rules. It can help a multi-charger site avoid treating every charger nameplate as an uncontrolled simultaneous load.
Load balancing does not create additional electricity. The selected site limit must still deliver the required energy before vehicles depart while leaving sufficient capacity for other facility loads and agreed operating reserves.
The control arrangement needs a defined capacity limit, a reliable source of load information and rules for distributing the remaining power between active charging sessions.
Obtain the required site or feeder load value from the approved metering and communication arrangement.
Compare current facility demand with the configured site limit and operating reserve.
Distribute permitted charging power according to active vehicles, equipment limits and project priorities.
Recalculate allocation when vehicle demand, connector status or other facility loads change.
The final specification should identify the charger hardware separately from the site-level controller, meter, communication and allocation requirements.
| Category | Selection Item | Available Specification |
|---|---|---|
| AC Input | Voltage Range | AC380V ±20% |
| AC Input | Connection | 3P + N + PE |
| AC Input | Operating Frequency | 45–65Hz |
| Electrical | Power Factor | ≥0.95 under normal output power |
| DC Output | Rated-Power Options | 40 / 60 / 80 / 120 / 160 / 180 / 240kW |
| DC Output | Voltage Range | DC200–1000V |
| DC Output | Series Current | 0–300A; final limit depends on configuration |
| Interface | Connector Options | CCS1 / CCS2 / GB/T / CHAdeMO |
| Interface | Connector Quantity | 2 standard; project options up to 4 guns |
| Cable | Standard Length | 5m; optional length upgrade available |
| Cooling | Charging Cable Cooling | Air cooling; liquid cooling optional |
| Load Control | Site Power Limit | Project-defined managed charging requirement |
| Load Control | Allocation Method | Defined according to project control logic |
| Load Control | Metering Input | Meter and interface require project confirmation |
| Communication | Network Options | LAN / Wi-Fi / 4G by ordered configuration |
| Communication | Charging Protocol | Optional OCPP; version confirmed by project |
| Environment | Operating Temperature | -20°C to 50°C |
| Environment | Storage Temperature | -40°C to 85°C |
| Environment | Humidity | 5–90% RH, non-condensing |
| Environment | Altitude | ≤2000m |
| Installation | Cabinet Type | Floor-mounted; indoor or outdoor use |
| Enclosure | Protection Level | IP54 |
| Customization | Project Support | OEM, ODM and project-specific configuration |
Different sites need different priorities. The control method should be selected from real vehicle schedules and operating risks rather than from charger quantity alone.
Share permitted power between active connectors when vehicles have similar importance and charging windows.
Allocate more capacity to vehicles with earlier departure deadlines, subject to charger and vehicle limits.
Use the remaining energy requirement and available charging window when these inputs can be supplied reliably.
Reduce charging demand when other building loads approach the defined connection or transformer limit.
Move available capacity when one vehicle reduces its request during the charging curve or completes its session.
Use approved operating schedules where site demand limits or electricity conditions vary by time period.
The simplified display below illustrates the operating principle only. Actual power values, minimum allocation steps and response times must be confirmed for the ordered system.
A load-management design is incomplete until it states how the charging equipment responds when the meter, local controller, network or backend becomes unavailable.
Define whether charging reduces to a conservative limit, pauses or follows another approved rule when live measurement is unavailable.
Specify the permitted local output and recovery process if the site-level controller stops communicating with the chargers.
Confirm whether load balancing is performed locally or depends on the remote platform, then define the corresponding offline behavior.
Test how current limits, queued instructions, alarms and active sessions are handled when communication is restored.
It is a control method that adjusts charging output according to a defined site limit, current facility demand, connected vehicles and configured allocation priorities.
It can cap coincident charger demand below the unmanaged sum of charger ratings. The proposed limit must still satisfy vehicle energy requirements, charging windows and other facility loads.
Not necessarily. Power may be divided equally or allocated according to vehicle demand, departure time, energy target or another confirmed project rule.
Provide the utility and transformer limits, existing interval-load data, measurement point, charger arrangement, vehicle energy requirements, charging windows and planned future loads.
The control architecture may use charger, local-controller and backend functions in different combinations. State the required OCPP version and whether allocation must continue without the remote platform.
The required fallback rule must be defined during system design. Possible project responses include a conservative charging limit, controlled pause or another approved local operating state.
Send the charger and connector quantities, vehicle schedules, required energy, charger ratings, site supply, transformer limit, existing load data, metering arrangement, allocation priorities, fallback rules, OCPP platform, destination and OEM needs.
Send the utility limit, transformer capacity, existing load profile, charger layout, vehicle schedules, energy targets and control requirements for a project review.
Hot Tags: dynamic load balancing dc charger, China dynamic load balancing dc charger manufacturers, suppliers, factory, 11kw ev wallbox charger, 30kw ev dc gb t charger, ccs2 dc portable ev charger iso61851, charger station ev 22kw wall mounted column, ev charging station for india dc, wallbox dc charging station